Jamal Trulove — Framed for Murder by SFPD
SFPD detectives fabricated evidence, manipulated a witness identification, and ignored another suspect to frame Jamal Trulove for the murder of his friend. He spent 6 years in prison on a 50-years-to-life sentence before an appeals court found prosecutorial misconduct. A jury acquitted him at retrial. A federal jury then found the detectives violated his civil rights — the largest verdict ever against the SFPD. No officers were disciplined.
What Happened
On July 23, 2007, Seu Kuka was shot and killed at the Sunnydale Housing Project in San Francisco. Kuka was Jamal Trulove's friend. Hours after the murder, SFPD detectives already had Trulove as their prime suspect — before any investigation.
That night, an eyewitness named Priscilla Lualemaga told police she "didn't really get a good look at the shooter." When she failed to identify Trulove in an interview, a detective asked her: "Are you sure it wasn't Jamal Trulove?"
The following evening, detectives showed Lualemaga a photo lineup. But it wasn't a real lineup — it included the same photo of Trulove from the previous night, along with people she already knew and hadn't identified as the shooter. The detectives told her they had already identified the shooter and would show her his photo.
The detectives were also aware of another suspect. They didn't investigate him.
A jury convicted Trulove of first-degree murder in 2010. He was sentenced to 50 years to life.
Key Players
Timeline
Outcome
Jamal Trulove was acquitted. A federal jury confirmed what he said all along: SFPD detectives framed him. They fabricated evidence, manipulated a witness, and ignored the real suspect.
All four officers named in the lawsuit retired. None were disciplined. The $13.1 million came from San Francisco taxpayers.
Why This Matters
A detective asked a witness who said she couldn't identify the shooter: "Are you sure it wasn't Jamal Trulove?" That single question — planted by a cop — cost a man 6 years of his life and $13.1 million of taxpayer money.
The detectives who framed him retired with full pensions. The city wrote a check. Nobody went to prison for fabricating a murder case.
When police can frame a man for murder and face zero consequences, the system isn't broken. It's working exactly as designed — just not for you.
Take Action
Demand Police Accountability
Sources
- NPR: San Francisco To Pay $13.1 Million To Man Framed By Police For Murder
- KQED: Jury Finds San Francisco Police Officers Framed a Man for Murder
- CBS: Jamal Trulove, Man Framed By SFPD, Receives $13.1M
- The Appeal: San Francisco Is Paying For Trulove's Wrongful Conviction
- NSBHF: $10 Million — Largest-Ever Jury Verdict Against SFPD
- Wikipedia: Jamal Trulove